CLOSE

Specials

I agree We use cookies on this website to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies. More info

Skip to: Curated Story Group 1
Life Sciences Review
US
EUROPE
APAC
CANADA

About Us

Conference

Partner With Us

  • US
    • EUROPE
    • APAC
    • CANADA
    • LATAM
  • Drug Discovery
    Antibodies
    BioTech
    Cell and Gene Therapy
    Clinical Trial
    Drug Discovery and Development
    Life Science AI
    Regenerative Medicine
    Therapeutics
  • Biomanufacturing
    Biomanufacturing
    Biomarker
    Bioprocessing
    Blood Bank
    CDMO
    Clinical Laboratory
    CRO
    Life Science Testing
    Skin Care
    Supplements
  • Business Services
    Life Science Consulting
    Life Science Facility Service
    Life Science Financial Services
    Life Science Marketing
    Life Science Recruitment Firms
    Pharma Wholesale and Distribution
    Pharmacy Management
    Regulatory and Compliance
    Regulatory Services
    Technologies and Software
  • Leadership Perspectives
  • Innovation Insights
  • Research
  • News
  • Magazines
  • CXO Awards
×
#

Life Science Review Weekly Brief

Be first to read the latest tech news, Industry Leader's Insights, and CIO interviews of medium and large enterprises exclusively from Life Science Review

Subscribe

loading

Thank you for Subscribing to Life Science Review Weekly Brief

Pluripotent Stem Cells as the Gold Standard in Preclinical Testing

Pluripotent stem cells revolutionize drug testing by providing reliable human models, enhancing safety assessments, and accelerating drug discovery, transforming preclinical research and clinical outcomes. 

By

Life Sciences Review | Friday, May 01, 2026

The journey of a new drug from a laboratory bench to a patient's bedside is long, expensive, and fraught with failure. For decades, the pharmaceutical industry has grappled with a fundamental disconnect: the models used to test a drug's safety and efficacy—primarily immortalized cancer cell lines and animal models—are often poor predictors of how a compound will behave in the human body. This predictive failure is the principal driver of the "valley of death" in drug development, where promising candidates fail late-stage clinical trials, costing billions of dollars and delaying medical progress.


Today, a new technology has moved from the realm of academic science to the frontline of industrial drug discovery: pluripotent stem cells (PSCs). These unique cells are not just an incremental improvement; they represent a revolutionary leap, establishing a new gold standard for in vitro testing by providing, for the first time, a scalable, reliable, and biologically relevant window into human physiology.

Stay ahead of the industry with exclusive feature stories on the top companies, expert insights and the latest news delivered straight to your inbox. Subscribe today.


The Human-Relevant Revolution


Pluripotent stem cells are pluripotent, meaning they have the remarkable ability to differentiate into more than 200 cell types that make up the human body. They can self-renew indefinitely in culture, offering a limitless, consistent supply of human cells.


This capability is most powerfully realized through induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). This technology allows scientists to take a simple somatic cell from an individual—such as a skin or blood cell—and reprogram it back into a pluripotent state. From this iPSC state, researchers can use established protocols, or "recipes," to guide the cells toward becoming functional, specialized human cells of interest.


The implications are profound. Instead of testing a new heart medication on a rat's heart cells or a generic, decades-old tumor line, researchers can now test it on a plate of beating, functional human cardiomyocytes (heart muscle cells). Instead of approximating liver toxicity in a mouse, they can measure it directly in human hepatocytes (liver cells). This "human-in-a-dish" approach moves drug testing from the realm of analogy to the realm of direct human biology, dramatically increasing the relevance and predictive power of preclinical data.


A New Standard for Safety: Transforming Toxicology


Unforeseen toxicity remains a leading cause of late-stage drug failure, as compounds that appear safe in animal studies can reveal harmful effects only when administered to humans. Pluripotent stem cell (PSC) technologies are helping to de-risk this challenge by enabling highly sensitive, human-specific toxicity assessments early in drug development. For cardiotoxicity, the industry is increasingly adopting assays based on induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived cardiomyocytes, which form functional, spontaneously beating networks in vitro. These models, coupled with advanced electrophysiological readouts, allow detection of subtle pro-arrhythmic effects that were previously impossible to observe outside clinical settings. Similarly, iPSC-derived hepatocytes are now widely used to evaluate drug-induced liver injury (DILI), offering insight not only into direct cellular toxicity but also into drug metabolism, metabolite toxicity, and potential drug–drug interactions. iPSC-based neural models, including human neurons and astrocytes, address a long-standing gap in predicting neurotoxicity by enabling early screening for risks such as neurodegeneration, seizures, and peripheral neuropathy. Together, these human-relevant PSC platforms are transforming preclinical safety testing by identifying toxic liabilities long before clinical trials begin.


Accelerating Efficacy: Finding Cures with Precision


Beyond just proving a drug is safe, PSCs are accelerating the search for drugs that work. This is where the true personalized potential of iPSCs comes to light.


The technology allows for the creation of "disease-in-a-dish" models. By sourcing somatic cells from patients with a specific genetic disease—such as Parkinson's, Alzheimer's, or a rare neurological disorder—researchers can create iPSC lines that carry that individual's exact genetic blueprint for the disease.


These iPSCs are then differentiated into the cell type most affected by the illness (e.g., motor neurons for ALS, or dopaminergic neurons for Parkinson's). For the first time, researchers can study the disease's mechanisms as they unfold in a human cell and, most critically, use these diseased cells for high-throughput screening (HTS). Automated systems can test thousands, or even millions, of potential drug compounds simultaneously, looking for the one that "rescues" diseased cells—for example, by stopping neurodegeneration or restoring normal function.


This technology opens the door to population-based screening. By creating cell banks from diverse human populations, researchers can test how a single drug might affect individuals of different genetic backgrounds, predicting variations in efficacy and side effects before a trial even begins.


The industry is already pushing beyond simple 2D cell cultures. 3D organoids, or "mini-organs," are a prime example. Scientists can now coax iPSCs to self-assemble in three dimensions, forming complex structures that mimic the architecture and cell-type diversity of a human organ. Mini-brains, mini-livers, and mini-kidneys are now being used to study how a drug affects not just a single cell type, but a complex, interacting human biological system. This concept is taken a step further with organ-on-a-chip platforms. These microfluidic devices, often the size of a thumb drive, house iPSC-derived cells in 3D chambers. Tiny channels simulate blood flow, apply mechanical forces, and connect different "organs" (e.g., a "liver" chip connected to a "kidney" chip) to model systemic, multi-organ drug effects.


Pluripotent stem cell technology is no longer a future-facing promise; it is a foundational, industrial-scale tool in active use today. By providing an unlimited source of physiologically relevant, functional human cells, PSCs have created a new standard.


More in News

Growing Concerns About Data Continuity in Biopharma Evidence Generation

One of the common concerns within biopharma is not a matter of generating evidence per se. What makes it even harder is the possibility of sustaining a consistent stream of information through several studies or regulations over prolonged periods of time. As such, the issue of data continuity gains more importance as evidence generation software solutions are currently evaluated by potential buyers. Evidentiary initiatives are never limited to the sole scope of their objectives. Information retrieved once can become relevant several times over the life cycle of a particular product. Researchers may need to re-examine certain findings, compare results of treatment between different periods of time or study data acquired within separate research processes. It becomes especially complicated if there are no consistent information sources within an organization. Such considerations begin to impact the choice of evidence generation software. While the tools themselves are hardly ever used to produce any scientific insights directly, their contribution lies in facilitating further evidence processing and management. The problem becomes apparent as evidentiary research programs move past their initial objectives. It is rare for evidence generation initiatives to have a definite deadline or goal. Several years may pass between the start of the research process and its end, which means that there can be many staff changes, reconsiderations of previous assumptions or emergence of new questions. When information proves hard to find or analyze, the whole process can be slowed down significantly. The amount of effort spent tracking documents, verifying the integrity of information and understanding research history may prove to be considerable. At the same time, these aspects might not become a major focus of technology evaluation. Procurement conversations about evidence generation software solutions are shifting in this direction. Buyers' attention moves from operational effectiveness to information sustainability as evidence programs grow more extensive and complex. They are starting to see evidence generation software platforms as tools for sustaining knowledge over time rather than project management resources. This brings a change to the list of priorities for software developers. Features aimed at optimizing research processes are essential but buyers become concerned with data preservation as well. As such, information continuity becomes part of a solution's institutional memory function rather than just another aspect of project management. While data continuity may not be as prominent as some new trends in evidence analytics, it addresses a pressing problem faced by many biopharma teams. Evidence generation projects tend to outlast their budgets, original objectives or even the members of a team conducting research. For biopharma companies investing in such tools, the problem is shifting from acquiring new information to keeping existing data context-sensitive. ...Read more

Inventus welcomes senior figure from Google as a board adviser

Inventus, the only company in the world dedicated to creating purpose-built devices and technology solutions exclusively for clinical trials, has made a key appointment from Google to its advisory board. Mark Bennett, a Vice President at Google, will be working with Inventus in the capacity of Board Adviser. Bennett has more than two decades in senior leadership roles at companies including Microsoft, Sainsbury’s & Tesco. He is currently Google’s Vice President of Knowledge & Information Partnerships for the EMEA region, leading product partnerships for Search, Gemini, Maps, Commerce, Research and Ads . Bennett has spent more than 10 years in Google Partnerships across a range of teams including Knowledge & Information, Android, Google Hardware and Google Play. Bennett’s previous roles at Google include VP for Platforms and Devices Partnerships for the APAC region and Vice President for Google’s Global Android Partnerships. Bennett said he was excited to support Inventus - known for its innovative and industry leading clinical trial solutions - to help map out its next phase of growth. He said: “I’m delighted to be advising the board at Inventus. I’m impressed by the growth and strategy of the company and am looking forward to helping them accelerate that trajectory. I’ve been intrigued by the biomedical sciences sector for some time and seen how AI is an increasingly important factor for the industry. I’ll be advising Inventus on how technology can be harnessed to enhance the efficiency, effectiveness and overall impact of clinical trials, helping bring better treatments to patients faster.” Bennett is the second key appointment from Google at Inventus in recent months. Earlier this year, Jon French, Managing Director of Google’s Android Global Business, was appointed Group Managing Director at Inventus. Commenting on Bennett’s new role, French said: “I could not be more excited to welcome Mark to the Inventus advisory board. I know personally what an incredible leader Mark is. His expertise and perspective will be tremendous assets to our business. “As Inventus enters its next phase of growth, his experience, judgement and strategic vision will help shape our direction and strengthen our ability to achieve our long-term ambitions. At the heart of everything we do at Inventus is a commitment to help bring life-changing treatments to patients faster.” Bennett is the second appointment to the Inventus advisory board – he joins Stacy Hurt, chief patient officer at Parexel, who was welcomed as a Board Adviser in the summer. Parexel is a global clinical development partner. Hurt leads efforts to integrate patient perspectives into drug development and healthcare at their earliest stages. Hurt has more than two decades of leadership experience in the pharmaceutical space. She has worked for GlaxoSmithKline, Transdermal Therapeutics and Colon Cancer Coalition across sales, training and development and has over a decade of experience in patient advocacy. Steve Sanghera, CEO and Co-Founder of Inventus, said: “I am delighted to announce the exceptional appointment of Mark Bennett to the Inventus Board. Mark brings world class technology leadership and knowledge which will be instrumental in guiding our journey as we navigate how AI will shape and influence clinical trials. Mark’s appointment reflects the continuous growth of Inventus within the industry. Together with Stacy, the expertise that we now have at Inventus also demonstrates our commitment to building a business that focuses on technological excellence and the patients which sit at the heart of a clinical trial.” ...Read more

Inventus welcomes senior figure from Google as a board adviser

Inventus, the only company in the world dedicated to creating purpose-built devices and technology solutions exclusively for clinical trials, has made a key appointment from Google to its advisory board. Mark Bennett, a Vice President at Google, will be working with Inventus in the capacity of Board Adviser. Bennett has more than two decades in senior leadership roles at companies including Microsoft, Sainsbury’s & Tesco. He is currently Google’s Vice President of Knowledge & Information Partnerships for the EMEA region, leading product partnerships for Search, Gemini, Maps, Commerce, Research and Ads . Bennett has spent more than 10 years in Google Partnerships across a range of teams including Knowledge & Information, Android, Google Hardware and Google Play. Bennett’s previous roles at Google include VP for Platforms and Devices Partnerships for the APAC region and Vice President for Google’s Global Android Partnerships. Bennett said he was excited to support Inventus - known for its innovative and industry leading clinical trial solutions - to help map out its next phase of growth. He said: “I’m delighted to be advising the board at Inventus. I’m impressed by the growth and strategy of the company and am looking forward to helping them accelerate that trajectory. I’ve been intrigued by the biomedical sciences sector for some time and seen how AI is an increasingly important factor for the industry. I’ll be advising Inventus on how technology can be harnessed to enhance the efficiency, effectiveness and overall impact of clinical trials, helping bring better treatments to patients faster.” Bennett is the second key appointment from Google at Inventus in recent months. Earlier this year, Jon French, Managing Director of Google’s Android Global Business, was appointed Group Managing Director at Inventus. Commenting on Bennett’s new role, French said: “I could not be more excited to welcome Mark to the Inventus advisory board. I know personally what an incredible leader Mark is. His expertise and perspective will be tremendous assets to our business. “As Inventus enters its next phase of growth, his experience, judgement and strategic vision will help shape our direction and strengthen our ability to achieve our long-term ambitions. At the heart of everything we do at Inventus is a commitment to help bring life-changing treatments to patients faster.” Bennett is the second appointment to the Inventus advisory board – he joins Stacy Hurt, chief patient officer at Parexel, who was welcomed as a Board Adviser in the summer. Parexel is a global clinical development partner. Hurt leads efforts to integrate patient perspectives into drug development and healthcare at their earliest stages. Hurt has more than two decades of leadership experience in the pharmaceutical space. She has worked for GlaxoSmithKline, Transdermal Therapeutics and Colon Cancer Coalition across sales, training and development and has over a decade of experience in patient advocacy. Steve Sanghera, CEO and Co-Founder of Inventus, said: “I am delighted to announce the exceptional appointment of Mark Bennett to the Inventus Board. Mark brings world class technology leadership and knowledge which will be instrumental in guiding our journey as we navigate how AI will shape and influence clinical trials. Mark’s appointment reflects the continuous growth of Inventus within the industry. Together with Stacy, the expertise that we now have at Inventus also demonstrates our commitment to building a business that focuses on technological excellence and the patients which sit at the heart of a clinical trial.” ...Read more

Autologous and Allogeneic Models Push Cell Therapy Toward Different Development Paths

Cell therapy product development is becoming more segmented as autologous and allogeneic products place different demands on design, manufacturing and commercialization. Developers can no longer discuss the sector as one uniform category. Product strategy depends heavily on whether cells come from the patient or from a donor source. Autologous therapies are often built around individualized production. A patient’s own cells are collected, processed and returned as a therapy. This model can create a strong biological fit, but it also places pressure on scheduling, chain of identity, release timelines and site coordination. Every patient-specific batch becomes both a treatment and a manufacturing event. Allogeneic therapies take a different approach. Instead of using each patient's own cells, they rely on donor-derived or engineered cells that can be produced in larger batches and supplied to more patients. This model has the potential to improve access and make therapies more widely available, provided quality, immune compatibility and long-term performance are carefully managed. At the same time, it brings its own set of challenges, including how cells are sourced, how consistently they can be expanded during manufacturing, how they are stored and how different patients may respond to the treatment. Industry analysis from Thermo Fisher Scientific’s Patheon unit notes that autologous therapies require individualized handling because each treatment is tailored to a patient’s cells, while allogeneic therapies must ensure consistent quality and address immune compatibility across recipients. These differences influence product development from the very beginning. For autologous therapies, developers often concentrate on coordinating the entire vein-to-vein process, including logistics, site readiness, rapid release testing and making sure each patient's cells move through the system efficiently. Developers of allogeneic therapies face a different set of priorities, with greater attention on master cell banks, consistency between production batches, inventory management and large-scale quality control. Each approach comes with its own operational challenges, costs and risks that need to be managed throughout development. Manufacturing partners are therefore becoming more specialized. A partner supporting allogeneic production may need scale-up expertise and robust batch release processes. Developers must choose partners based on model fit, not general cell therapy experience alone. Digital systems are becoming important in both pathways. Developers need data continuity from cell collection through manufacturing and administration. Gaps in records can create delays and weaken confidence. Better data handling can support quality review and long-term learning across batches or patient cases. The future of cell therapy product development will likely involve both models advancing in parallel. Autologous and allogeneic approaches solve different problems and face different barriers. The companies best positioned will be those that align biology, manufacturing design, clinical planning and commercial delivery around the specific therapy model they are building. ...Read more
Life Sciences Review
Follow on LinkedIn

About

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Partner With Us

Stay Connected

  • Subscribe
  • Newsletter
  • Sitemap

Contact Us

  • editor@lifesciencesreview.com
  • sales@lifesciencesreview.com
  • marketing@lifesciencesreview.com

Legal

  • Editorial Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use

© 2026 Life Sciences Review . All rights reserved.

This content is copyright protected

However, if you would like to share the information in this article, you may use the link below:

https://www.lifesciencesreview.com/news/pluripotent-stem-cells-as-the-gold-standard-in-preclinical-testing-nwid-2913.html