Harnessing Molecular Modeling: Catalyzing Innovation in Latin America

Molecular modeling and structural bioinformatics groups strengthen research efficiency, specialized expertise, collaboration and business innovation across Latin America.

Life Sciences Review | Monday, September 07, 2026

Research teams focused on molecular modeling and structural bioinformatics provide substantial value for companies aiming to enhance their understanding of biology and molecules. This is particularly important in the dynamic landscape of Latin America, where the biotechnology, pharmaceutical, academic sciences, and healthcare industries are continually advancing their capabilities.

Through combining computational techniques, structural analysis, data analysis, and teamwork, such teams may help research projects while making their process of discovery more efficient. This way, the business value of molecular modeling and structural bioinformatics goes beyond academic research, as computational knowledge may be used by organizations in order to assess their research investment opportunities.

Stay ahead of the industry with exclusive feature stories on the top companies, expert insights and the latest news delivered straight to your inbox. Subscribe today.

Strengthening Computational Research Capabilities

Molecular modeling studies molecules, proteins, chemicals, and their interactions using computational techniques. This is supplemented by structural bioinformatics that helps analyze biological data to identify any relations among molecular structure, sequence, and function. Combining both fields can allow scientists to obtain relevant information for preliminary investigation and further work in the lab. For companies, this may help improve the way their research teams plan experiments and distribute their technical resources.

Research groups that have expertise in these fields can collaborate with pharmaceutical, biotech, agriculture, chemical, and health care companies for projects that involve specialized computational knowledge. These research groups could be capable of providing services such as molecular simulations, structure predictions, docking studies, sequence analysis, database construction, and biological data analysis. Organizations can benefit from such collaborations by having the option of not building all the specialized competencies within their teams initially.

Latin American research groups could also add to their scientific potential through training professionals knowledgeable in computational methods as well as biology. Both educational institutions, research organizations, and commercial enterprises could take advantage of collaboration where education is linked to the needs of practical research. In view of the increasing importance of science based on data analysis, the development of expertise in computational biology could serve as a tool for workforce development and the creation of special research services.

Unlocking Business Insights with Structural Bioinformatics

The field of structural bioinformatics may assist organizations in understanding biological data prior to allocating any substantial amount of money on laboratory investigations. By looking at the molecular structure and associated databases, investigators are able to observe trends and make hypotheses. The use of computation is not meant to replace experimentation, but rather it may allow groups to focus their investigation.

This particular ability can be very helpful in pharmaceutical studies, especially because at an early stage, there will be many different compounds and biological targets involved. Using computation for studying the molecular interactions can help get important insights that may be used for further testing. Companies can benefit from using these insights while planning their research and avoid performing unnecessary experiments in laboratories. Such applications can be useful for biotech research, agriculture and chemistry research in particular.

Data management is yet another crucial issue. Structure-oriented research produces a large quantity of data by using public sources, experimental work in laboratories, modeling, and analytics. Well-endowed bioinformatics teams can be helpful for organizing, processing, and interpreting these data sets, which allows an organization to effectively use data that would be hard to analyze otherwise. Sound data structures provide reproducibility, cooperation, and further research.

Building Sustainable Research Partnerships

Organizations within Latin America could benefit from collaboration with molecular modeling and structural bioinformatics by gaining access to expert knowledge as well as developing flexible research models. The collaboration could include contract research, collaborative research, academic collaboration, training and technology collaboration models. Each research model could be adapted based on the project’s complexity, resource availability, IP, and other criteria.

The creation of successful collaborations depends on having goals in mind, adequate data management, roles to be played, and communication between computing and experimental groups. Companies must consider technical infrastructure that enables scientific work to be carried out, such as computer power, software, storage solutions, and security measures. This will help to ensure the success of collaborative work.

Regional business prospects have been positively influenced by overall growth in computational sciences and the increased significance of research capability. Organizations willing to collaborate with skilled research groups will be able to benefit from research expertise while being more capable of controlling the costs and schedules of their projects. Skilled research groups, on the other hand, may increase their applicability through matching research capabilities with the needs of industries.

Research groups dealing with molecular modeling and structural bioinformatics have the potential to contribute greatly to the development of the knowledge economy in Latin America. The link between computational work and biological research enables them to achieve greater efficiency in discoveries, collaboration, and scientific data utilization.

For enterprises, the benefit would be the successful utilization of their capabilities in the context of practical research decisions with appropriate validation and professionalism. With the growth of regional expertise, the cooperation of research organizations and the industry could foster sustainable innovation, employment, and involvement in global science projects.

More in News

Growing Concerns About Data Continuity in Biopharma Evidence Generation

One of the common concerns within biopharma is not a matter of generating evidence per se. What makes it even harder is the possibility of sustaining a consistent stream of information through several studies or regulations over prolonged periods of time. As such, the issue of data continuity gains more importance as evidence generation software solutions are currently evaluated by potential buyers. Evidentiary initiatives are never limited to the sole scope of their objectives. Information retrieved once can become relevant several times over the life cycle of a particular product. Researchers may need to re-examine certain findings, compare results of treatment between different periods of time or study data acquired within separate research processes. It becomes especially complicated if there are no consistent information sources within an organization. Such considerations begin to impact the choice of evidence generation software. While the tools themselves are hardly ever used to produce any scientific insights directly, their contribution lies in facilitating further evidence processing and management. The problem becomes apparent as evidentiary research programs move past their initial objectives. It is rare for evidence generation initiatives to have a definite deadline or goal. Several years may pass between the start of the research process and its end, which means that there can be many staff changes, reconsiderations of previous assumptions or emergence of new questions. When information proves hard to find or analyze, the whole process can be slowed down significantly. The amount of effort spent tracking documents, verifying the integrity of information and understanding research history may prove to be considerable. At the same time, these aspects might not become a major focus of technology evaluation. Procurement conversations about evidence generation software solutions are shifting in this direction. Buyers' attention moves from operational effectiveness to information sustainability as evidence programs grow more extensive and complex. They are starting to see evidence generation software platforms as tools for sustaining knowledge over time rather than project management resources. This brings a change to the list of priorities for software developers. Features aimed at optimizing research processes are essential but buyers become concerned with data preservation as well. As such, information continuity becomes part of a solution's institutional memory function rather than just another aspect of project management. While data continuity may not be as prominent as some new trends in evidence analytics, it addresses a pressing problem faced by many biopharma teams. Evidence generation projects tend to outlast their budgets, original objectives or even the members of a team conducting research. For biopharma companies investing in such tools, the problem is shifting from acquiring new information to keeping existing data context-sensitive. ...Read more

Choosing Microbial CDMO without Losing Process Control

Commercial biologics programs rarely stall because a sponsor failed to reserve manufacturing capacity. Delays are more likely to appear when fermentation assumptions, purification readiness, assay design and batch documentation fall out of sync. Microbial manufacturing is particularly sensitive at this stage. A process that performs well during development can quickly lose momentum if harvest conditions are not fully understood or impurity clearance has not been aligned with the characteristics of the molecule. For executives evaluating a CDMO, manufacturing capacity is important, but maintaining process continuity is even more critical. The strongest CDMOs do not treat development and manufacturing as separate stages handed from one department to another. Instead, they manage them as a continuous, controlled process. Analytical strategy is developed while the process is still being refined, manufacturing constraints are identified before GMP transfer, sampling routes are planned early and documentation evolves alongside the program instead of being rebuilt for clinical or commercial manufacturing. This goes beyond administrative efficiency. It is an important part of controlling risk. Changes to analytical methods or batch records late in development can trigger comparability work and make regulatory review more challenging. "Richter BioLogics aligns well with the priorities many sponsors look for when they need microbial expertise backed by GMP manufacturing." A thorough evaluation should also examine how fermentation and purification work together in practice. Separate upstream and downstream suites can offer sponsors greater flexibility, but only if the transition between them is carefully managed. Having real-time harvest data, purification teams ready to receive material, buffers prepared in advance and clear sample routes in place helps avoid the disruption that often occurs between the bioreactor and the first chromatography step. The same level of scrutiny applies to plasmid DNA manufacturing, where supercoiled content, host-cell impurities, endotoxin burden and unwanted isoforms all influence whether the final material is suitable for its intended use. Quality systems should be assessed through evidence, not broad assurances. Every GMP manufacturing program generates extensive documentation, and that record should remain clear and consistent from raw material receipt and media preparation through in-process testing, deviations, investigations and final product release. Buyers should look at whether quality control is integrated closely enough with manufacturing to detect early process signals. They should also consider whether the CDMO has the in-house analytical expertise needed for release testing, stability studies, troubleshooting and comparability work, instead of relying on outside laboratories whenever challenges arise. "For sponsors working to demanding timelines, Richter BioLogics brings together specialized microbial expertise, disciplined documentation, in-house analytical testing and direct project coordination." Scale also deserves careful consideration. A larger facility does not automatically make decisions faster, and a smaller specialist may not have enough built-in redundancy. A better question is whether the manufacturing model gives sponsors direct access to scientific expertise while providing the GMP infrastructure needed to support late-stage development and commercial production. That balance is especially important in microbial biologics. Therapeutic proteins, antibody fragments, bacterial vaccines and plasmid DNA each bring different manufacturing demands, so buyers should look beyond broad claims about capacity and examine the depth of process and analytical expertise behind them. Richter BioLogics aligns well with the priorities many sponsors look for when they need microbial expertise backed by GMP manufacturing. Its capabilities span process development, analytical development, microbial GMP manufacturing and plasmid DNA production, including the pART plasmid platform. The company operates independent upstream and downstream processing lines across two multiproduct GMP facilities, with quality control integrated throughout manufacturing campaigns. It supports therapeutic proteins, VHH or Nanobody formats, bacterial vaccines and plasmid DNA. A long GMP manufacturing track record, recent capacity expansion, in-house analytical capabilities and a 2026 FDA inspection with zero observations provide added confidence. For sponsors working to demanding timelines, Richter BioLogics brings together specialized microbial expertise, disciplined documentation, in-house analytical testing and direct project coordination. ...Read more

Inventus welcomes senior figure from Google as a board adviser

Inventus, the only company in the world dedicated to creating purpose-built devices and technology solutions exclusively for clinical trials, has made a key appointment from Google to its advisory board. Mark Bennett, a Vice President at Google, will be working with Inventus in the capacity of Board Adviser. Bennett has more than two decades in senior leadership roles at companies including Microsoft, Sainsbury’s & Tesco. He is currently Google’s Vice President of Knowledge & Information Partnerships for the EMEA region, leading product partnerships for Search, Gemini, Maps, Commerce, Research and Ads . Bennett has spent more than 10 years in Google Partnerships across a range of teams including Knowledge & Information, Android, Google Hardware and Google Play. Bennett’s previous roles at Google include VP for Platforms and Devices Partnerships for the APAC region and Vice President for Google’s Global Android Partnerships. Bennett said he was excited to support Inventus - known for its innovative and industry leading clinical trial solutions - to help map out its next phase of growth. He said: “I’m delighted to be advising the board at Inventus. I’m impressed by the growth and strategy of the company and am looking forward to helping them accelerate that trajectory. I’ve been intrigued by the biomedical sciences sector for some time and seen how AI is an increasingly important factor for the industry. I’ll be advising Inventus on how technology can be harnessed to enhance the efficiency, effectiveness and overall impact of clinical trials, helping bring better treatments to patients faster.” Bennett is the second key appointment from Google at Inventus in recent months. Earlier this year, Jon French, Managing Director of Google’s Android Global Business, was appointed Group Managing Director at Inventus. Commenting on Bennett’s new role, French said: “I could not be more excited to welcome Mark to the Inventus advisory board. I know personally what an incredible leader Mark is. His expertise and perspective will be tremendous assets to our business. “As Inventus enters its next phase of growth, his experience, judgement and strategic vision will help shape our direction and strengthen our ability to achieve our long-term ambitions. At the heart of everything we do at Inventus is a commitment to help bring life-changing treatments to patients faster.” Bennett is the second appointment to the Inventus advisory board – he joins Stacy Hurt, chief patient officer at Parexel, who was welcomed as a Board Adviser in the summer. Parexel is a global clinical development partner. Hurt leads efforts to integrate patient perspectives into drug development and healthcare at their earliest stages. Hurt has more than two decades of leadership experience in the pharmaceutical space. She has worked for GlaxoSmithKline, Transdermal Therapeutics and Colon Cancer Coalition across sales, training and development and has over a decade of experience in patient advocacy. Steve Sanghera, CEO and Co-Founder of Inventus, said: “I am delighted to announce the exceptional appointment of Mark Bennett to the Inventus Board. Mark brings world class technology leadership and knowledge which will be instrumental in guiding our journey as we navigate how AI will shape and influence clinical trials. Mark’s appointment reflects the continuous growth of Inventus within the industry. Together with Stacy, the expertise that we now have at Inventus also demonstrates our commitment to building a business that focuses on technological excellence and the patients which sit at the heart of a clinical trial.” ...Read more

Inventus welcomes senior figure from Google as a board adviser

Specials

Harnessing Molecular Modeling: Catalyzing Innovation in Latin America

Molecular modeling and structural bioinformatics groups strengthen research efficiency, specialized expertise, collaboration and business innovation across Latin America.